Skip to content
AI WEB AWARDSOPEN CALL / 2027OPEN JURY
How It WorksHow It WorksCategoriesCategoriesAwardsAwardsWinnersWinnersMethodologyMethodology
2027SUBMIT A WEBSITE →
AI-ASSISTED WEBSITE EVALUATIONOPEN CALL 2027

HOW GOODIS YOURWEBSITE,REALLY?

Chrome Open Jury 2027 award medallion with a red ribbon

Submit a public website. We examine its design, usability, accessibility, SEO, performance and technical execution. Websites meeting the published standard earn a verified award.

READ THE STANDARD
PUBLIC URLS ONLY / SAFE PASSIVE CHECK
YOU PAY FOR THE EVALUATION—NOT THE AWARD.QUALIFICATION DEPENDS ON THE RESULT. / 001
Visual DesignUser ExperienceMobile ExperienceAccessibilitySEOPerformanceContent QualityTechnical QualitySecurity BasicsInnovationConversion ClarityVisual DesignUser ExperienceMobile ExperienceAccessibilitySEOPerformanceContent QualityTechnical QualitySecurity BasicsInnovationConversion Clarity
THE OPEN JURY / LIVE DEMONSTRATIONSCROLL TO JUDGE ↓
HTTPS://FIELD-NOTES.DEMODESKTOP / MOBILE
Fictional Field Notes demonstration website under evaluation

01 / WE LOOK

02 / WE EXAMINE

NavigationContentMobile

03 / WE MEASURE

92DESIGN
84MOBILE
79PERFORMANCE
88SEO

04 / WE PRIORITIZE

P1Improve largest visual loading
P1Strengthen heading structure
P2Increase mobile target spacing
P2Clarify primary conversion action

05 / THE RESULT

Sample Excellence Award certificate marked as a demonstration
86/ 100

EXCELLENCE AWARD — SAMPLE RESULT
THIS IS A DEMONSTRATION. IT IS NOT A REAL AWARD RECIPIENT.

ELEVEN CATEGORY POSTERS

01 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Visual Design

Does the visual system hold together?

Hierarchy, craft, consistency and visual intent.92
02 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

User Experience

Can people move without friction?

Clarity, navigation and task completion.91
03 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Mobile Experience

Does every screen belong to the same experience?

Responsive quality across small screens.87
04 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Accessibility

Can everyone use it?

Automated findings and manual-review signals.80
05 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

SEO

Can the right people find it?

Crawlability, metadata and semantic structure.88
06 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Performance

Does it respect people's time?

Lab speed, stability and responsiveness.79
07 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Content Quality

Does the message earn attention?

Usefulness, clarity and editorial confidence.90
08 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Technical Quality

Is the foundation sound?

Markup, errors and implementation discipline.84
09 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Security Basics

Passive checks only

Passive transport and browser-visible signals.86
10 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Innovation

Does it move the medium forward?

Distinctive ideas with purposeful execution.89
11 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Conversion Clarity

Does attention become action?

Intent, calls to action and decision support.85

ELEVEN CATEGORY POSTERS

01 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Visual Design

Does the visual system hold together?

Hierarchy, craft, consistency and visual intent.92
02 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

User Experience

Can people move without friction?

Clarity, navigation and task completion.91
03 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Mobile Experience

Does every screen belong to the same experience?

Responsive quality across small screens.87
04 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Accessibility

Can everyone use it?

Automated findings and manual-review signals.80
05 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

SEO

Can the right people find it?

Crawlability, metadata and semantic structure.88
06 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Performance

Does it respect people's time?

Lab speed, stability and responsiveness.79
07 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Content Quality

Does the message earn attention?

Usefulness, clarity and editorial confidence.90
08 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Technical Quality

Is the foundation sound?

Markup, errors and implementation discipline.84
09 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Security Basics

Passive checks only

Passive transport and browser-visible signals.86
10 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Innovation

Does it move the medium forward?

Distinctive ideas with purposeful execution.89
11 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Conversion Clarity

Does attention become action?

Intent, calls to action and decision support.85
01 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Visual Design

Does the visual system hold together?

Hierarchy, craft, consistency and visual intent.92
02 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

User Experience

Can people move without friction?

Clarity, navigation and task completion.91
03 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Mobile Experience

Does every screen belong to the same experience?

Responsive quality across small screens.87
04 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Accessibility

Can everyone use it?

Automated findings and manual-review signals.80
05 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

SEO

Can the right people find it?

Crawlability, metadata and semantic structure.88
06 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Performance

Does it respect people's time?

Lab speed, stability and responsiveness.79
07 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Content Quality

Does the message earn attention?

Usefulness, clarity and editorial confidence.90
08 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Technical Quality

Is the foundation sound?

Markup, errors and implementation discipline.84
09 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Security Basics

Passive checks only

Passive transport and browser-visible signals.86
10 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Innovation

Does it move the medium forward?

Distinctive ideas with purposeful execution.89
11 / 11SAMPLE SCORE

Conversion Clarity

Does attention become action?

Intent, calls to action and decision support.85
THE ELEVEN-DIMENSION STANDARDSCROLL THROUGH THE POSTERS →

THE AWARD EXHIBITION / 2027

Recognition should be difficult to earn.

01VERIFIABLE OBJECT
Merit Award medallion representation

Merit Award

Strong websites with sound fundamentals across the complete evaluation.

VIEW STANDARD →
02VERIFIABLE OBJECT
Excellence Award medallion representation

Excellence Award

Outstanding work across most categories, showing deliberate craft rather than defaults.

VIEW STANDARD →
03VERIFIABLE OBJECT
Site of Distinction medallion representation

Site of Distinction

Exceptional websites that set a higher benchmark for the categories they enter.

VIEW STANDARD →

PAYMENT STARTS THE EVALUATION. IT NEVER DETERMINES THE RESULT.

FINAL QUALIFICATION THRESHOLDS WILL BE PUBLISHED BEFORE THE FIRST OFFICIAL AWARDS ARE ISSUED.

THE ARCHIVE / DEMONSTRATION

VIEW ARCHIVE →
001

Northstar Analytics

86
Field Notes fictional demonstration entry website
CANADA / CULTUREEXCELLENCE SAMPLE / 86DEMONSTRATION ENTRY — NOT AN OFFICIAL WINNER

No mystery score. No pay-to-win.

One public URL is enough. We do not access private, gated or password-protected areas.

Visible limitation: AI-assisted evaluation can identify patterns and prioritize evidence, but it cannot replace every human, legal, cultural or security review. The report names those boundaries instead of hiding them.

READ THE COMPLETE METHODOLOGY

ENTRY / TRANSPARENT PRICING

Start with a preview. Pay only when you want the complete evaluation.

FREE PREVIEW

URL validation, availability and high-level category preview

NO ACCOUNT REQUIRED

START PREVIEW

FULL EVALUATION

Desktop and mobile evidence, 11 scores, findings, report and qualification result

AWARD NOT GUARANTEED

VIEW PRICING

PAYMENT COVERS THE WORK REQUIRED TO EVALUATE THE WEBSITE. IT DOES NOT BUY A CERTIFICATE OR GUARANTEE AN AWARD.

OPEN CALL / 2027

PUT YOUR
WEBSITE
BEFORE
THE JURY.

PUBLIC URLS ONLY / SAFE PASSIVE CHECK
AI WEB AWARDS
WinnersPublished resultsMethodologyEvaluation policyContactTermsPrivacy

Edition 001
Open call / 2027

Methodology
Version 1.0

Awards are earned.
Evaluation is paid.

© 2026 AI Web Awards
Independent evaluation